THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (SEVEN) DAVID ROCKEFELLER & THE FEDERAL RESERVE

Last November 5, 2010, a conference was held at Jekyll Island, off the coast of Georgia, -sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and Rutgers University- to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the drafting of the U.S. Federal Reserve bill.

At the expensive buffet that followed such an austere celebration, cheerful toasts were made to those deserving representatives from the Rockefellers' and the Rothschilds', who had written so blatantly conspiratorial and illegal bill.1

Three years after that “historical” day, in 1913 (many claim that unconstitutionally during the Christmas recess of Congress), President Woodrow Wilson finally signed the Federal Reserve Act. 1

A few years later, President Wilson would regret having followed the advice of his personal counselor, "Colonel" Edward Mendel House.1

Wilson's had realized too late that the “internationalists" ideas of the "Colonel" coincided too much with the international bankers' interests; so much, that Wilson complained of having given the country to these. 1

The signature of the Fed Act had gave culmination to over a century of struggle among American politicians and representatives of international banking, led by the Rothschild clan, to establish a central bank in America in order to control its economy.2

Today, there are fingers pointing at the Federal Reserve as the instrument of an alleged international financial elite -led, among others, by the Rockefeller and Rothschild-in order to controll the U.S. economy, currency, banking industry and government ., and thus, impose its supremacy over the rest of the planet.

However, too much water has passed under the bridge.

Do the same interests still control the Fed?

This is a matter of high importance for democracy and the rule of law, the founding principles of this nation, and the life of all U.S. citizens and the world.

This is because the Federal Reserve is the guardian of the most powerful economy in the world and the regulator of all financial institutions in America and the largest ones in the world.

To find those who control the Fed, we must understand its functioning, which, though highly complex, can be summarized in a nutshell.

The Federal Reserve System consists of 12 district banks, all national banks and a segment of the state banks.
The Fed is the bank of banks, and the U.S. government's bank, the most openhanded consumer and the greatest debtor in the world.

The Treasury has a checking account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. All profits from federal taxes and other payments to the government are managed through this account.

The Fed sells and pays off government securities such as Treasury savings bonds and notes.

When the government is short of funds, the Treasury issues bonds and delivers them to bond dealers, which auction them off.

When the Fed wants to "expand the money supply" (create money), it steps in and buys bonds from these dealers with newly-issued dollars.

When Federal Reserve was created as a private trust, the government surrendered to the Fed its prerogative of printing money and distributing it to financial institutions, a government exclusive privilege.

The money printed by the Fed in order to buy government bonds increases the amount of currency. In this way, Fed’s activity is essentially inflationist: printing of new money lowers dollar’s value and, therefore, increases inflation.

The manipulation of dollar’s value by the Fed policies affects not only the American consumer. They also impact in exchange rates and economies all over the planet. This is because, as we know, the dollar is the universal currency and reserve.

But this is not the most worrisome.

The new money created by the Fed to buy government bonds is produced through an act of magic: they just type a few numbers on a computer screen into the Treasury bank account.5

The Federal Reserve's maneuvers to "create" money are called "open market operations" because the Fed buys the bonds issued by the Treasure at the brokers' "open market".3

The government debt bonds become the "reserves" that the international banking community uses to support its lending. Thus, all operations and bank interest of the world are closely intertwined with the policies of the Fed.

Because of how the Federal Reserve works, the value of money isn't based on precious metals value nor other collateral but only in the "credit" the U.S. government to pay its debts.

The bad news is that Moody's, Standard & Poor's, and Fitch announced last April 18, 2011, that due to the huge U.S. fiscal debt, the credit of the U.S. government may lose the next two years his triple A condition.

The announcement of the credit rating agencies was a bomb in the securities and exchange markets.
If the U.S. government is about to lose its credit, this means that government bonds and the dollar will lost their value as currency and bank reserves, a real catastrophe for the global financial world.

The worst thing is that the very fabric of profits for the banks is another sleight movement known as loans for "fractional reserve."

The "fractional reserve" lending consist in lending the same reserves many times over, further expanding the money supply,(i.e., not backed by any collateral). 5

The Federal Reserve "… has the power to determine… the size of foreign exchange reserves abroad… In a practical sense, the Federal Reserve System is the lender of last resort to the international banking system, and the determinant of the dollar value of world reserves."7

Federal Reserve also has the ability to regulate bank interest rates.

If interest rates are reduced, there will be more demand for loans and the economy will "warm up". If the rates are increased, there will be less borrowing and therefore the economy will "cool down".3

The world economy responds to the movements of the U.S. economy. Therefore, by regulating the amount of money in circulation and bank interest rates, the Fed controls the entire global economy.

Moreover, currently, through institutions such as the Automated Clearing House or ACH8, the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication or SWIFT9 and others, the Fed monitors electronic banking around the world, which today is literally all.

In short, the Fed has more power and influence over the economy and the live of U.S. and world than any other government entity or not, whether American or foreign.

The Federal Reserve is, therefore, as we had said, the most powerful institution world.3

This means that whoever controls the Federal Reserve controls the planet.

But who actually dominate the Fed?

One of the great secrets of the Federal Reserve for nearly a century was its private ownership character, nongovernmental, quite the opposite of what its name suggests.

Eustace Mullins says that his research on the Federal Reserve was motivated by the suspicion suggested by Ezra Pound in 1949 that it was not a government organization but a private one.10 This happened 36 years after the creation of the Fed among educated and well informed people. So, what about the rest of the public?
Such secret began to be public only in the past five years, almost a century after the creation of the Fed, thanks to the free flow of information over the Internet.

However, the names of the real owners of the Federal Reserve remain one of the best kept mysteries of the planet.

One provision of the Federal Reserve Act prohibits revealing the identity of its shareholders.
There is great controversy about the real owners of the Fed.

Many critics of the Federal Reserve say that it is in the hands, not just off private, but foreign interests. And that these foreign interests use the Fed as an instrument of pressure on the U.S. government in the sense of their interests on world domination.

Those who drafted the Federal Reserve bill and lobbied in behalf of the Fed Act early last century left no room for doubts. But a century has passed; hence there is a need to check or rebuff this accusation.

Edward Flaherty, Ph.D. in Economics from the College of Charleston11, one of the most fervent defenders of the Federal Reserve, has devoted many efforts to discredit the accusations of the opposition to it.

Flaherty attacks are aimed particularly against Edward Griffin, author of "The Creature from Jekyll Island"12, Eustace Mullins, who wrote "The Secrets of the Federal Reserve"13, and Gary H Kah, author of "On the Road to Global Occupation."14

Flaherty flatly denies their accusations that the Federal Reserve Act was passed in an illegal and unconstitutional way and that the principal shareholders of the Fed (the main owners) are foreigners.15

According to critics of the Federal Reserve, by the way the system was designed by its founder, who controls the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, controls the entire system.16

Each of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks is organized into a corporation whose shares are sold to commercial banks and thrifts operating in the Bank district.

Shareholders elect six of the nine directors of the regional board of Federal Reserve Bank and its presidents.
Mullins says that the first eight shareholders of the Federal Reserve of New York were, in order from highest to lowest since 1983, the Citibank, Chase Manhattan, Morgan Guaranty Trust, Chemical Bank, Hanover Manufacturers Trust, Bankers Trust Company, National Bank North America, and the Bank of New York.17

According to Mullins, overall, these banks control 63% of the outstanding shares of the New York Fed.
Many of these banks, says Mullins, are owned by a dozen European banks, mostly British, in particular, of the Rothschild banking dynasty. Through their American agents, they are able to select the board of the New York Fed and direct U.S. monetary policy.17

Flaherty contends that the source of Mullins’ information (the Federal Reserve Bulletin, according to this) over the shareholders of the New York Federal Reserve cannot be verified, as this or any other periodical of the Federal Reserve has never included any information on the shareholders. 15

Moreover, Flaherty is right to say that the investigation of the shareholders of the Fed is very difficult because the Federal Reserve banks are not publicly traded corporations and, therefore, the Securities and Exchange Commission cannot require the publication of a list of its main shareholders.15

Apart from the conjecture on foreign ownership, Flaherty criticizes the Mullins' argument that New York banks that hold a majority of the shares of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York can choose its board and its chairman. In this way, these banks, and thus, the London connection, according to Mullins, have the control over the operations of the Fed and U.S. monetary policy 15

Flaherty objects this statement arguing that each commercial bank receives only one vote, regardless of its size, unlike most corporate voting structures in which the number of votes is tied to the number of shares that a person has.15

If the Federal Reserve district of New York contains more than 1,000 member banks, Flaherty argues that it is highly unlikely that the largest and most powerful banks could force many of the smaller ones to vote in a particular way.15

Controlling the votes of a majority of member banks, as properly thinks Flaherty, would mean acquiring a majority stake in about 500 member banks of the District of New York.15

To gain control over the Federal Reserve, Flaherty estimated that is required an outlay of hundreds of billions of dollars, which encourages Flaherty to think that, surely, there is a cheaper way for the global domination.15

Many critics of the Federal Reserve believe that yes, that the Anglo-American and global banking elite (with the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds at their top) has enough money to make such an investment and more.
If you study history, you may discover that this, undoubtedly, despite its enormous cost, would be the cheapest way to world domination.

But Flaherty is right about the difficulties to know the main shareholders of the Federal Reserve.

However, the knowledge of the main shareholders of the Federal Reserve can be discovered indirectly just looking for who really controls it.

In that sense, there is an interesting report of the Congressional Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing of 1976. Among its members, we found the then newly elected Congressman Ron Paul, one of the main enemies of the Fed and the Tea Party inspirator 19

The study is entitled "Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking influence".20

The president of this congressional committee, the Democrat Rep. Henry Reuss of Wisconsin, writes in the foreword that this is a staff study of the corporate, banking and trade association relationships of the directors of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks. .21

The reason for such a study, admits Reuss, lies in the Committee concern for many years about the influence of private interests over the essentially public responsibilities of the Federal Reserve System. 21

"The study, says Reuss, raise substantial questions about the supposed 'independence' of the Fed, which is completely subordinate to the big banks and big business, if one takes into account the strong interconnections revealed by this study." 21

The dependent nature of the district boards, continues Reuss, affects the public interest across a broad spectrum, from monetary policy to banking regulation.21

The tables in the report clearly show that significant segments of corporate power and banking have broad channels of communication and influence with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, undoubtedly the most important of the district banks, with important roles in politics monetary and international operations around the Federal Reserve System.22

The report says that: "At the national level, some of the activities of the Federal Reserve directors are masked behind their corporate shields, and it is often difficult to distinguish the lobbying generated by the Federal Reserve banks from that of the corporate-banking lobby." 22

Logic is that, given the weight and power of the Federal Reserve System on the government, the nation and the world at large, it should be subject to regular audits from various government agencies.

Despite the weight of its operation over the government and the economy, as a non government entity, the Fed's decisions do not require the approval of the president or any other government power.3

In the letter of the law, the Federal Reserve must be supervised by the Congress.3 However, in its nearly 100 years, has never been audited or monitored by anyone.

Successive presidents and administrations of the Federal Reserve have acted with impunity without supervision or control, been completely unknown their internal and external activities.

The current Federal Reserve chairman, Ben Bernanke, on numerous occasions before Congress, has refused to answer key questions on domestic activity and the fate of Federal Reserve loans.23

But worst is the influence that the leadership of the Federal Reserve has over the legislative body of the nation and its flat refusal to the transparency of its operations and connections.

In this regard the congressional committee’s report tells us that "The battle of last year (1975) on proposals to require regular audits of the activities of the Federal Reserve by the General Accounting Office is a good example of the weight of influence Directors of the Federal Reserve on legislative matters ".22

Throughout 1975, directors of Federal Reserve district banks flooded the Congress with letters urging the defeat of the audit legislation from General Accounting Office. 22

For its part, the leadership of the Federal Reserve had mobilized all bank managers and private corporations throughout the length and breadth of the country urging them to lead lobbyists’ campaigns against the audit.24

One of the lobbying group that includes the biggest of the big corporations in this country, where the directors of the Federal Reserve maintained a strong membership, is the Business Roundtable.24

Among its 164 corporate members were the big three of the auto industry, the three largest banks in the country, seven of the largest oil companies and the granddaddy of big utilities—AT&T.24

In 1973, the Business Roundtable-at the request of Dr. Burns-wired its members and asked them to help repel the bill. When lobbying pressure mounted against the new audit proposal in 1975, a study was conducted by Wright Patman (the former chairman of the CBCH) which revealed the close relationship between the private lobbying organization and our supposedly "public" Federal Reserve System.25

Another organization of big business, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, has strong connections with the Federal Reserve.

The House, which often lobbies on legislative issues of banking and the Federal Reserve, has a policy committee on banking, monetary and fiscal policies. Thirty-one of its members are officers or directors of banks and eight have connections with directors Federal Reserve System.25

While the law limits banks' direct participation in the councils of the district banks, they actually infiltrate all levels of the system.

Through the district boards and the combined branches, one in five jobs for not bankers and public members end up in bankers' hands. 25

The resignations of the board of directors of commercial banks to legitimize the Federal Reserve designations are generally understood as temporary.

In general, commercial banks hold the positions supposedly "liberated" by their "ex-officials" who go on to work at the Fed so that they can occupy them again as soon as they complete their "public" service. In this regard, the Congress Committee report gives lots of examples.26

The excessive input by special interests would be a serious problem in any public agency, but the situation becomes more serious since the Federal Reserve banks assume greater regulatory powers.27

While Corporate America has wide representation—through director interlocks—with all twelve banks in the Federal Reserve System, analysis of each district bank and cross-checking one district bank with the others reveals not only the narrow pool of talent but the "club" nature of the system.28

This "club” approach leads the Federal Reserve to consistently dip into the same pools—the same companies, the same universities, the same bank holding companies—to fill directorships.28

The report of the Congressional CBCH ends with the bitter acknowledgement that "the Federal Reserve system is dominated by a very small universe of private institutions" and that ... " the directors of the Federal Reserve are clearly representative of a small elite group which dominates much of the economic life of this nation.”28

Anyway, the 1976 congressional report does not explicitly say who the main shareholders of the Federal Reserve are; however, by simple association, it is easy to discover.

The Federal Reserve Act provides that the shareholders are those who choose six of the nine directors of the board and the chairman of each of its 12 district banks.3

The congressional report reveals that the majority of the directors of the three classes of the Fed district banks are representatives of the largest private banking and financial corporations in the nation, who, in their functions, prioritize these interests instead the public interest.

This indirectly tells us that the main shareholders, the owners of the Federal Reserve, are none other than the dome of the "club" of Corporate America to which the report relates.

However, it remains to verify or disprove the thesis, denied by Flaherty, that the Federal Reserve is dominated by foreign interests.

Although today as yesterday, the Fed tries to evade transparency, I don't think it's very difficult to follow the clues leading to the Fed's foreign connection.

The Congressional report acknowledges that the bank District of New York Federal Reserve is the most important and influential of the system.24

Recall that Mullins said that who controls the Fed bank in New York, dominates the system, thesis refused by Flaherty.

Reading the charts of the 1976 report, among the Class A directors of Fed bank in New York, we found the name of our old friend David Rockefeller.30

The presence of David Rockefeller in such position of power does transcend the problem of corporate influence to international levels.

David Rockefeller inherited the fortune and influence of his father, John D. Rockefeller Junior, being the head of the clan to the death of all his older brothers.

Realizing the intense financial and politic activity of David Rockefeller at international levels we can't discard the suspicion that the same spirit that prevailed in 1910 at Jekyll Island lives on in its heirs.

David Rockefeller is the most prominent follower of the "internationalist" ideas that his father had learned from the "Colonel" Edward Mendel House.35

While serving as director class Fed Bank of New York, David not only was in charge of major corporations and national and international banking organizations. Among these was the Chase Manhattan Bank, across the street from the Fed Bank of New York, and various private and corporate organizations as the Chase International Advisory Committee (IAC) and the New York Clearing House, among others. This surely invalidated him by law to be Class A director of the Federal Reserve. 31

Simultaneously, David was head of the most important institutions of the political, aristocratic, banking, corporate, cultural and academic world elite as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderberg Club, Trilateral Commission, among others.

David himself has repeatedly expressed its global vocation by saying:

"... The world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world
government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world
bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in
past centuries."32

"Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working
against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me
as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a
more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you
will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."33

Many point their fingers at David Rockefeller as the undisputed leader, with the support from the House of Rothschild, of the Anglo-American and international banking in general. In future articles we will see the facts that lead some to this conclusion.

If such is the case, there is no better position to influence over American and world finances and politics but to be director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

And this brings us back to the long and intimate relationship between David Rockefeller and Fidel Castro.

It seems that, as we shall see in subsequent articles, Fidel Castro is a key player in the international political chess carried out for the tremendous work of David Rockefeller in his capacity of leader of the "internationalist" financial elite.
………………………..
NOTES

1.- View previous article on this blog on Wednesday, March 16, 2011 entitled THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (SIX) R+R=RF (ROCKEFELLER + ROTHSCHILD = FEDERAL RESERVE).
2.- View previous article on this blog on Tuesday, February 1, 2011 entitled THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (FIVE) THE ROTHSCHILD AND THE CENTRAL BANC OF AMERICA.
3.-Federal Reserve Tutorial http://www.investopedia.com/university/thefed/
4--http://www.prisonplanet.com/bernanke-arrogantly-refuses-to-disclose-which-banks-took-loans.html y http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX2qvbznGKM
5.-Who Owns The Federal Reserve? by Ellen Brown http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10489
6.-http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/a-financial-atom-bomb-44241?FIELD9=1
7.-Mundell, Robert A., International Monetary Options, Cato Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, Spring 1983, p.191. Citado en http://www.house.gov/jec/imf/lolr.htm
8.-http://www.achq.com/services/ach.php?gclid=CNnejPLp8acCFcxj2godkAv7aQ
9.- http://www.swift.com/about_swift/legal/compliance/statements_on_compliance/swift_supports_calls_for_debate_

to_move_beyond_data_privacy_to_security_and_public_safety/BE_SWIFT_ExecutiveSummary_061109.pdf 10.- http://www.rebelnews.org/downloads/Federal-reserve.pdf. P. 6.
11.- http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/flaherty/Federal_Reserve.html
12.- http://www.orwelltoday.com/jekyllislandbook.shtml
13.- http://www.rebelnews.org/downloads/Federal-reserve.pdf
14.- http://www.scribd.com/doc/38993668/En-Route-to-Global-Occupation-by-Gary-Kah
15.- http://www.usagold.com/federalreserve.html
16.-http://www.zimbio.com/David+de+Rothschild/articles/6/Wo+Owns+Federal+Reserve+Rothschilds+Bank+England
17.- http://www.rebelnews.org/downloads/Federal-reserve.pdf p. 179
18.-http://www.rebelnews.org/downloads/Federal-reserve.pdf, p. 47-48
19.- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul
20.- FEDERAL RESERVE DIRECTORS: A STUDY OF CORPORATE AND BANKING INFLUENCE http://adabyron.net/FederalReserveDirectors.pdf
21. Ibídem, p. III
22.- Ibídem, p 56
23.- http://www.prisonplanet.com/bernanke-arrogantly-refuses-to-disclose-which-banks-took-loans.html y http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX2qvbznGKM
24. FEDERAL RESERVE DIRECTORS:, Ibídem, p. 56-57
25.- FEDERAL RESERVE DIRECTORS, Ibídem. p. 57
26.- FEDERAL RESERVE DIRECTORS, Ibídem. p. 58.
27.- FEDERAL RESERVE DIRECTORS, Ibídem. p. 59-60
28.- FEDERAL RESERVE DIRECTORS, Ibídem. p 120
29.- Eustace Mullins “Secrets Of The Federal Reserve” http://www.rebelnews.org/downloads/Federal-reserve.pdf, p. 40
30.- FEDERAL RESERVE DIRECTORS, Ibídem. p 9
31.- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Rockefeller
32.- David Rockefeller (1991 Speech to the Trilateral Commission). http://luntworld.blogspot.com/2008/01/david-rockefeller-quote-for-january-10.html
33.- David Rockefeller, Memoirs, Random House, 2002, p. 405
34.-http://www.coffeeatjoes.com/fed-releases-895-pdfs-in-response-to-court-order-fed-does-not-disclose-collateral-for-loans-why-secrecy-is-a-problem-fdics-role-in-the-mess/
35. .- View previous article on this blog on Tuesday, November 2, 2010entitled THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (THREE) THE ROCKEFELLERS

THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (SIX) R+R=FR (ROCKEFELLER + ROTHSCHILD = FEDERAL RESERVE)

100 years ago, some journalists witnessed certain event, but, unable to imagine its implications, they couldn't even think in reporting it.

On the night of November 22, 1910, at the Hoboken train station in New Jersey, a group of political and financial personalities boarded a train with costumes that gave them the innocent appearance of a hunting party.

The car occupied by the conspicuous troupe was sealed and the windows veiled. To enhance the mystery, its members had been instructed to not address each other by their surnames. The destination of the convoy was so secret that some passengers ignored it.

The train took the “hunting party" a thousand miles south, to the coast of Georgia from where it was transported undercover to an island with the significant name of Jekyll. Here, the "hunters" were accommodated in the exclusive country club, where they were confined for more than a week without any communication with the outside.

Leading the group was Senator Nelson Aldrich of Rhode Island. Among his companions, there were prominent figures from the Treasury Department, the National City Bank and First National Bank of New York, the J. P. Morgan Company, and a Kuhn, Loeb & Co. associate. [1]

In summary, in Jekyll Island met senior representatives of the U.S. government, from JP Morgan, from Rockefellers and from the Rothschilds in complete secrecy.
But why such important figures of politics and finance acted in such a way?

First, the object of "hunting party" was to give culmination to the creation of a central bank of America, dispute that had been developing throughout U.S. history.

In the previous article* we saw how, on several occasions, the international banking, leaded by the house of Rothschild, had tried to implement its power over the economy and the U.S. government through successive central banks.

Several founding fathers and political figures repeatedly opposed the creation of an American central bank because of its dangers of corruption, speculation and foreign domination. So, they managed to bury the project in 1836, when the charter of the Second Bank of America was repealed.*

The conspirators of Jekyll Island were preparing to evoke the specter of the U.S. central bank behind the back of voters, political parties and U.S. government institutions.

The purpose of the conspicuous "hunting party" was drafting the bill for the creation of the ultimate and definitive U.S. private central bank, which would emerge under the misleading name of the U.S. Federal Reserve.

Second, the conspirators of Jekyll Island were violating the U.S. Constitution and laws.

Senator Aldrich, according to the U.S. legislative process, must submit the bill to the Congress Legislative Service Bureau in order to draft it properly. [2]

However, he worked secretly with representatives of international private banking, which drafted the bill according to their interests instead of those of the American electorate.

By the way, there is a consensus among historians to consider the panic of 1907 as the main justification for the creation of the Federal Reserve seven years later.

It is known that the great financial powers have always taken advantage from economic crisis and from banking and stockmarket panics.

Tycoons like John D. Rockefeller and JP Morgan have used -if not caused, or, at least, helped- financial crises and panics to expand their empires.

The crisis of 1883 was partly caused and was greatly exploited by the Rockefellers to literally monopolize the oil industry.***

The crisis of 1893 was used by J.P. Morgan to expand its almost complete monopoly on the metallurgical, railway, electricity and telephone industries, among others. But above all, the crisis served to establish his dominion over U.S. banking. ***

Such was the power achieved by J.P. Morgan, that President Cleveland had to ask for his help to fill the exhausted coffers the U.S. government. To this end, between 1893 and 1896, backed by the power of the Rothschild, Morgan made flow million dollars in gold and then supported the issuance of millions in government bonds, acting in effect as the nation's central bank. [3]

The crisis of 1907 was caused by the precipitous drop in the stock market due to the unbridled speculation in real estate after the earthquake in San Francisco and the attempt to "corner the market"***** of the United Cooper Company. This caused many investors rushed to banks to take out their money and put it safe.

Amid the climate of market turmoil, J.P. Morgan precipitated the panic by spreading rumors about the insolvency of the Knickerbocker Trust Company, one of the largest U.S. banks. This mistrust extended to the rest of the banking system. [4]

However, such was the ascendancy achieved by Morgan on the U.S. economy that both the remaining private banks as the Secretary of the Treasury accepted without question their opinion of not supporting Knickerbocker and waited for his decisions to take actions in order to control the panic. [5]

Indeed, the financial collapse of 1907 was the reason of bringing back to the national table the question of the need for a central bank to support the lack of liquidity of banks in times of panic, etc.

The large banking interests used the press and certain politicians to harp on the issue. [6]

Because of the manipulation of public opinion, many of the former opponents to the creation of a central bank in North America fell into the trap of believing that this would be a defense against new financial panics and against the possibility that the strongest banks, like Morgan’s and the international bankers, obtain too much influence over the national economy.

In 1908, Congress passed the Aldrich-Vreeland Act, which created the National Monetary Commission to investigate the causes of the crisis of 1907 and find ways to avoid such situations. [7]

The promoter of this law was nothing less than the very Senator Nelson W. Aldrich of Rhode Island.

Aldrich was the Republican Senate leader and one of the most influential politicians in the U.S., becoming known by the nickname "general manager of the United States."

Aldrich himself was appointed as head of the National Monetary Commission, which was like putting the wolf in sheep grazing.

Aldrich not only was considered the "true voice" of JP Morgan, but he also was the father in law of John D. Junior Rockefeller, who, at the time, had been appointed by his father to succeed him at the head of the clan and Rockefellers' businesses. ***

As head of the National Monetary Commission, Aldrich got the carte blanche to deal directly with national and global banking elite (something forbidden for a member of the U.S. Senate) and travel to various countries to "study" the functioning of the national central banks Europe.

In 1909, in preparation of the master plan for the creation of the Federal Reserve, Aldrich introduced a constitutional amendment for the creation of income tax, which would further the payment of interest of the government debt with the planned central bank.

After two years of underground work, given the traditional refusal of Americans to the creation of a central bank, Aldrich was able to create the conditions for holding the secret meeting at the country club on Jekyll Island in November, 1910. [8]

With the Federal Reserve bill in hand as a political project, Aldrich, as chairman of the National Monetary Commission, visited the main financial centers of America and Europe seeking alliances and support. [9]

When he thought it was the right moment, in 1912, Aldrich presented the bill to U.S. Congress. Still, in both houses, the bill was attacked for giving too little or any involvement and control to the government and the public on the proposed central bank, and too much power to the bankers.

The former Treasury Secretary, Leslie M. Shawn, referring to the Federal Reserve Bill, said "... such an institution, whatever its name, put the business of the United States absolutely and irretrievably in the hands of Wall Street." [10]

Amid this struggle, the 1912 elections brought to Democrat Woodrow Wilson to the White House and gave the majority to the Democrats, which mostly opposed to the project of the Federal Reserve in both houses of Congress.

One might think that the arrival of Wilson to the White House would put the bankers very anxious. But, John D. Rockefeller junior and J.P. Morgan had a strong card up his sleeve.

On the one hand, they gave the Aldrich bill some makeup under the disguise of the Glass bill, which seemed to oppose the "money trust" of Wall Street to trick the Democrats.[8]

On the other hand, they asked for help to the personal adviser of President Wilson, the mysterious "Colonel" Edward Mandell House.

They had access to House through his most ardent disciple, Raymond B. Fosdick, who was a trustee of John D Rockefeller Junior and then, given his outstanding work in the government of Woodrow Wilson in favor of the interests of his bosses, he was rewarded as president of the Rockefeller Foundation. [11]

"Colonel" Edward House, who had never been in the military nor had been a colonel, was the great visionary of a "new world order" more "fair", almost communist, Fabian socialism inspired , where the wealth would be better distributed and the U.S. could play the role of world leader.

House conveyed similar "internationalists" ideas to his disciples Woodrow Wilson, Raymond Fosdick, and, through this, to John D. Rockefeller Jr., among others, ideas that later materialize with the creation of the Council on Foreign Relations or CFR in 1921 by John D. Rockefeller Junior and "Colonel" Edward House himself, among others.

Wilson came to revere so much the "Colonel" House's "lessons" that, when he was elected president, he made House his so personal and intimate adviser that he took him to live with him to the White House. [12]

Thus, through the "Colonel" House, John D. Rockefeller Junior and J.P. Morgan, representing the Rothschilds, persuaded Woodrow Wilson -the Democrat, the antitrust and the enemy of Wall Street- to sign in 1913 the laws of the Federal Reserve and the personal income tax in times of recess of Congress.[11]

Three years after signing the Federal Reserve Act, President Woodrow Wilson, evidently repented, wrote:

"The growth of the nation ... and all our activities are in the hands of a few
men ... We have come to be one of the worst ruled; one of the most completely
controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world ... no longer a
government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the free
vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small
group of dominant men."[13]

And he was right.

The Federal Reserve, despite its confusing name, was never a government agency. Quite the contrary.

The private nature of the Federal Reserve was kept secret until very recently, in the last five years, thanks to the free flow of information over the Internet.

So far, most Americans thought it was an exclusively governmental institution.

Many have rightly criticized the secrecy and impenetrability of the Federal Reserve, either to the press as to any of the branches of government, whether legislative, executive or judicial. [14]

During its nearly 97 years of existence, even though it is the source of funds to the government and of printing money for national and global circulation, the Federal Reserve has never been audited, although no one knows where their funds come from nor how or to whom are distributed. [15]

It is not until 2009 that it was introduced the bill on the transparency of the Federal Reserve [16] but the bill failed even though the massive mortgage fraud -involving members of the Federal Reserve Cartel- has brought the world into the deepest economic crisis since 1929..

Ben Bernanke, current Federal Reserve chairman, has refused to disclose to the Financial Services Committee of Congress the names of the banks that made loans nor the collateral used. [17]

The Federal Reserve and its great banking cartel seem to be outside and above the laws and government control.

The Federal Reserve is a private monopoly of the international banking elite. From its inception, it has had the control of the finances and economy of the U.S. and the world, and the U.S. government budget, as well. In addition, it has the unique privilege for an unofficial entity of print the money from the nation which, in turn, is the universal exchange currency. [18]

Each new government spending requires a loan from the Federal Reserve with interest thereon for the international banking elite, with the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds to the head, paid for with money raised by the government through the income tax from each resident in the U.S. territory.

Each new loan from the Federal Reserve to the government becomes in new printed money which enters into circulation, lowering the nominal value of the currency, and therefore a further increasing the inflation.

Moreover, each international bank transaction must pass through the U.S. Federal Reserve. In this way, its banking cartel dominates completely the world's financial and commercial movement. [19]

In short, the Fed has become in the financial base of the world domination by the international banking elite, whose headquarters are not located in New York or Washington, but in the City of London, the center of world's operations of the house of the Rothschilds.****

Finally, as we saw in the previous article, after a century of efforts to dominate the economy and the U.S. government through a central bank, as they had done with the European powers, the Rothschild met their goals with the creation of the Federal Reserve.***

If in the nineteenth century, the Rothschilds got their power through its global financial ascendancy over the British Crown through their control of the Bank of England, in the twentieth century, they have maintained and expanded this power through their influence on the U.S. government through Federal Reserve.

For his part, The Rockefellers have shared this power nationally and internationally through its alliance with the House of Rothschild, primarily through its main agent in the U.S., JP Morgan. So much so that the monopoly bank, JP Morgan Chase, will pass to the Rockefeller soon after Morgan's death, replacing this as the main agent of the Rothschilds in America.

On November 5, 2010, at the Jekyll Island, it was held a conference sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and Rutgers University to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the drafting of the Federal Reserve bill. [20]

These gentlemen weren't celebrating a milestone in the annals of the development of the U.S., its democracy and the rule of law, that is, the more progressive spirit of America.

Such a celebration praised the success of a conspiracy that gave power to the Rothschild and Rockefeller on the economy, politics, American and world culture.

And one of the heirs of that power, David, the son of John D. Rockefeller Junior, is precisely the main sponsor and intimate friend of Fidel Castro.

As will be discussed in the rest of this series, the true ideals of Fidel Castro are not nationalism or communism as he has assured all his life.

Fidel Castro has worked at a young age as the most loyal agent of those same interests that conspired Jekyll Island against American democratic paradigm and continue today attempting to establish the New World Order of international banking.

__________________________________________________________
NOTES:

PICTURE: Jewkyll Island’s Country Club House, Georgia.

* See it in the previous article of this blog, THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (FIVE) THE ROTHSCHILD AND THE CENTRAL BANK OF AMERICA http://havanaschooleng.blogspot.com/2011/02/cuban-conspiracy-five-rothschild-and.html
.
**See this blog article THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (FOUR) THE ROTHSCHILD http://havanaschooleng.blogspot.com/2010/12/cuban-conspiracy-four-rothschild_01.html

***See this blog article THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (THREE) THE ROCKEFELLERS http://havanaschooleng.blogspot.com/2010/11/civilization-is-what-its-leading-groups.html

****See this blog article THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (TWO): CASTRO & ROCKEFELLER
http://havanaschooleng.blogspot.com/2010/10/cuban-conspiracy-two-castro-rockefeller.html

***** Cornering the Market: In finance, to corner the market is to purchase enough of a particular stock, commodity, or other asset to allow the price to be manipulated…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornering_the_market
[1] Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins P 11 ttp://www.rebelnews.org/downloads/Federal-reserve.pdf
[2] http://www.myig.org/ms/ms_docs/BillWritingProcedure.MS.pdf
[3] http://millercenter.org/academic/americanpresident/cleveland/essays/biography/4
[4] http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/moen.panic.1907
[5] http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~histecon/crisis-next/1907/docs/Kavoussi-Panic_of_1907.pdf
.[6] THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT http://www.the7thfire.com/new_world_order/final_warning/federal_reserve_act.htm
[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldrich-Vreeland_Act
[8]THE GREAT DEBATE ON BANKING REFORM. NELSON ALDRICH AND THE ORIGINS OF THE FED http://www.ohiostatepress.org/books/Book%20PDFs/Wicker%20Great.pdf
[9] Balance of Power. The Political Fight for an Independent Central Bank.pdf http://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/balanceofpower/balanceofpower.pdf
[10] The Federal Reserve Act - Its Origin and Problems, by J. Lauwrence Laughlin, New York, 1933 cited in Balance of Power.The Political Fight for an Independent Central Bank.pdf http://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/balanceofpower/balanceofpower.pdf
[11] John D. Rockefeller Jr. and the Legacy of Woodrow Wilsonhttp://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/third_section/Rockerfeller_IntPart1.html
[12] http://www.archive.org/details/realcolonelhouse00lcsmit
[13] Woodrow Wilson: The New Freedom http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14811/14811-h/14811-h.htm#VIII
[14] http://www.examiner.com/libertarian-in-new-york/nyc-congressional-delegation-minority-opposing-federal-reserve-audit?cid=parsely#parsely
[15]http://www.house.gov/jec/fed/fed/transpar.pdf
[16]http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1207
[17]http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aS1eWoJj0sKc&refer=home
END THE FED BY RON PAUL http://mises.org/daily/3687
[18]Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins http://www.rebelnews.org/downloads/Federal-reserve.pdf
[19]Federal Reserve Tutorial http://www.investopedia.com/university/thefed/
[20]http://www.frbatlanta.org/news/conferences/10jekyll_index.cfm

THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (FIVE) THE ROTHSCHILD AND THE CENTRAL BANK OF AMERICA *

In the previous article**, we talked about the Rothschilds’ strategy of domination, which was based on the control of the central bank of a nation in order to dominate its economy and government. This was what they did in England, France, Germany and Austria, allowing them to expand their power over the rest of Europe and the world.
.
Not surprisingly, the United States did not escape the world domination plans of the Rothschilds, quite the opposite. But here was where they found the greatest resistance because of the refusal of Americans to bow to a central bank.
Lots of Conspiranoids perceived the hand of the Rothschild behind all attempts to create a central bank in North America since the very beginning of the U.S. Constitution. Actually, this was not exactly true.

During and after the American Revolution, the so-called "founding fathers" showed opposed attitudes concerning the idea of forming a central bank.

England had tried to put the 13 North American colonies under the control of the Bank of England long before the Rothschilds set up their control over it. [1] Some founding fathers saw this as the "high" of English oppression, which -among other things, like the tax on Cuban molasses imports - led to the revolutionary war.[2]

However, other founding fathers favored the creation of a central bank and succeeded. In 1781, Congress issued an ordinance to incorporate the Bank of America as a national private bank to follow in the footsteps of the Bank of England. [3]

The functions of the Bank of North America, the first U.S. central bank, were dashed due to objections about "alarming foreign influence and favoritism, fraud claims and unfair competition from state banks. So, in 1785, the Pennsylvania legislature repealed its charter [4].

Six years later, in 1791, Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of the Treasury, agreed to support the transfer of the capital from New York to the banks of the Potomac in exchange for support for central bank project. As a result, that year, the First Bank of the United States was authorized by Congress.

Many accuse Hamilton of being an agent of the Rothschilds. However, these didn't have anything to do with the creation of the first two American central banks because they simply had no power to do so.

In 1791 Nathan Rothschild, with just 21, had just get established in England and his father, Mayer Amschel, had not yet reached the necessary influence over the Elector William of Hesse. [5]

However, as soon as the Rothschild extended their control over the major central banks in Europe and, especially, the Bank of England, they didn't rest until doing the same with America.

However, since its inception, the First Bank of the United States had become a center of currency speculation and monetary instability. Thomas Jefferson saw it as an engine for speculation, financial manipulation and corruption. [4] So the U.S. Congress in 1811 refused to renew the letter of the First Bank of the United States. [6]

Nathan Mayer Rothschild lost millions because of the refusal of the Congress to renew the charter of the U.S. central bank. Nathan, after 20 years of banking and stock manipulations in London, backed by the might of his family, had become the most powerful financial tycoon in Britain and he was in total position of strength [7]

While the Congress was deliberating the renewal of the charter of First Bank of America, Nathan issued his first threat of "Either the application for renewal of the Charter is granted, or the United States will be involved in the most disastrous war."

However, in Washington, Congress stood firm and the Charter was not renewed.
Nathan then ordered the British parliament to "Teach those impudent Americans a lesson: Bring them back to the colonial situation."

The British Prime Minister, Spencer Perceval, opposed to the demands of Nathan Rothschild, and coincidentally, on 11 May 1812, he made history as the only British prime minister to be assassinated in office. [8]

A month later, without having yet completed the mourning for his former Prime Minister, His Majesty's Government declared war on the U.S., despite being involved in the costly Napoleonic conflagration and in a profound economic and social crisis. [9]

It is true that among the reasons for the war of 1812 between the U.S. and England, were the British naval blockade to France, border disputes with Canada, etc. [10] However, in the end, the interests of the Rothschild had a major weight in the events.

And ultimately, Nathan Mayer Rothschild became the big winner of the conflict.

The war between the U.S. and Great Britain in 1814 ended in a sort of tie. However, U.S. had suffered great losses and the government debt soared along with inflation.

In the other hand, the Napoleonic wars had devastated the European agriculture and the American traders were eager to fill the huge gap in demand for food in the old continent.

For all the above, the same politicians that in the Congress and the White House had repealed the charter of the U.S. central bank, in 1816, were quick to sign the one that stated the establishment of the Second Bank of America . This, of course, fell back into the hands of the Rothschild, emerging now even more powerful after the Napoleonic era as the dominant force behind the major European central banks and, therefore, of their respective governments. **

Only a fifth of the capital of the Second Bank of North America belonged to the federal government. The rest came mostly from foreign investors. Among them was David Parish, the Rothschild agent in New York. Also, it appears that the Second Bank president, Nicholas Biddle, managed the bank according to these European interests (especially those of Rothschild) before the ones of Americans. [11]

Finally, excessive speculation, corruption and economic pressures on U.S. government agencies prompted President Andrew Jackson to withdraw the renewal of the charter of the Second Bank of America in 1836. [7]

Already in 1832, President Jackson ordered the Secretary of the Treasury to withdraw all deposits from the subsidiary banks of the Second Bank of America in order to deposit them in state banks. And, in 1835, he managed to pay all federal debt for the first and only time in history, which made the U.S. government independent from the control of the Anglo-American bankers. Maybe this caused him to be the first American president in suffering an assassination attempt in 1835. [12]

The suppression of the charter of the Second Bank of America in 1836 launched the so-called era of "free banking", during which prevailed banks authorized by the state with the power to issue money.

The Michigan Act of 1837 allowed the automatic authorization of banks that met the requirements without special permits from the state legislatures. This caused the proliferation of banks and what was called the "wildcat banking", accompanied by corruption, risky operations, anarchic money emissions, etc. [13]

Despite all the efforts of foreign bank branches and Americans (mostly Rothschilds’), in 1841, President John Tyler, against hundreds of death threats, vetoed the act to renew the charter of the Bank of America. This sealed the fate of the U.S. central bank project for the remaining of the nineteenth century. [14]

Despite they were in a vulnerable position without a national bank that ensure their interests, foreign investors saw an opportunity in state banks and sent its agents in order to create their own banks.

August Belmont, the principal agent of the Rothschilds in the U.S., established a large bank in New York and a number of other state banks in the south. The Rothschilds and other European investors made loans to state banks with very high interests and they had the controll over the lending decisions. [11]

Many state banks sought financing through the issuance of bonds, which in the end, were rejected by the difficulty of many banks, especially Southerners, to reimburse of the cost.

The Rothschilds and other foreign financial groups bought the repudiated bonds from the southern states and pressured the federal government to force these states to pay the claims in dispute. They also forced the federal government to assume the debts of state banks of the South as federal obligations. This heated the issue of "states' rights" against the "strong central authority", becoming, among many other burning issues, in the epicenter of the national crisis that led to the Civil War. [11]

Between February and March 1862 and March 1863, in order to pay the soaring cost of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln received congressional approval to raise a public loan of $ 450 million through the sale of the so-called greenbacks.
The greenback could not be redeemed until 1865, when three could be exchanged for one of silver. Still, they survived its original purpose and became full legal tender in 1879.

With the creation of "greenbacks", Lincoln solved the U.S. monetary crisis without the help of the International Bankers. In this way he earned the most dangerous enemies. [11]

The Times of London -reflecting the feelings in the City, the headquarters for Rothschild- said then about Lincoln's "greenbacks" "If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become endurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe." [11]

Years later, Bismarck, German Chancellor, said about Lincoln:
"He obtained from Congress the right to borrow from the people by selling to it the 'bonds' of States ... and the Government and the nation escaped the plots of the foreign financiers. They understood at once, that the United States would escape their grip. The death of Lincoln was resolved upon."[15]

After the (for many inevitable) Lincoln's assassination, Congress passed the Financing Act of April 12, 1866, in an attempt to remove the "greenbacks". This opened up the option to authorize national banks although it also greatly reduced the liquidity of the nation.

As an additional incentive for banks to submit to federal oversight, in 1865, Congress had begun to tax the notes of state banks (also called "letters of credit" or "vouchers") to a standard rate of 10 %, which encouraged many state banks to become national.

However, state banks responded to the widespread adoption of deposit accounts or checks that were the main source of income for many banks. This "dual banking system" of state and national banks led to a kind of anarchy amidst the thriving banking industry growth that led to the proliferation of commercial banks from the 1860's. [16]

In the midst of this activity, JP Morgan came to New York in 1857 and founded a branch of the London based bank of his father, Junus Morgan, an old agent of the Rothschild.***

With a ferocity and a insurmountable financial and business talent, and supported by the economic power of the Rothschild, Morgan -enemy of competition like Rockefeller- embarked on the conquest of America.

J.P. Morgan took advantage of financial crises and panics -when he don't created them-, whether sectorial or national, to take over whole branches of the economy in bankruptcy and eliminate competition. Thus, Morgan literally came to dominate banking, railways, metallurgy and the emerging electric industry, among others.

It is no coincidence that the three major economic crisis of 1873, 1893 and 1907 were linked with the speculations on railroads (from which Morgan went on to become almost the absolute Tsar) and the Morgan company was precisely the one which came to save U.S. economy, investing heavily in government bonds and bringing large quantities of gold from Europe to the U.S. [17]

Thanks to massive financial support from the Rothschilds'***, Morgan got almost the complete ascendancy over the U.S. banking and economy, acting as a central bank between 1893 and 1907.[15] This led to Lord Rothschild to send his warmest expression of "admiration and respect" to Morgan, his most valuable representative in America. [18]

However, Morgan realized that, despite the tremendous support of the Rothschild, he could never undertake the total financial dominance over the United States without the alliance with its fiercest competitor, the richest man in America, John D. Rockefeller.

For their part, especially after the breakup of their oil monopoly of the Standard Oil ***, the Rockefeller acknowledged that they could not control the economy and the U.S. government if not allied to the greatest financial power in the world, the House of Rothschild.

The Rockefellers, the Rothschilds and JP Morgan knew that financial panics and crises were the breeding ground for manipulating the economy as a whole in behalf their interests thanks to their fabulous liquidity.

After more than a century of political and economic struggles around the creation of an American Central bank, mainly controlled by the Rothschilds, the crisis of 1893 and 1907 gave to Morgan and Rockefeller the opportunity to justify the need of a central banking that would give them control over the economy and the U.S. government.
However, given the widespread rejection in North America to central banks and the foreing banking domination, they had to mask it under the disguise of the U.S. Federal Reserve.

The alliance with J.P. Morgan and Rothschild, as discussed in the following articles, will give access to the Rockefeller to the dome of global financial power. This will allow John D. Junior and their descendants to have a decisive influence on the economy and politics of both the United States and the whole world.

The influence of John D. Junior on world affairs will be inherited by his son David, the current head of the Rockefeller family.

Finally, we will see that the long relationship between David Rockefeller and Fidel Castro is deeply connected to the global financial and political leadership of the Rockefeller clan in alliance with the Rothschild.

NOTAS
* In the previous article, because of errors of the sources, I said wrongly that Meyer Amschel Rothschild had made his fortune juggling with the salaries of Hessian mercenaries hired by William I of Hesse to the British for their colonial wars and that this could have helped the victory Washington. This is completely wrong, honoring the American General. Actually, the Hessian troops cheated by Rothschild, were the ones used by the Britons in the Napoleonic wars. Excuse me my readers for the inaccuracies. The truth is that the Rothschilds began to have economic and political influence in the Napoleonic era. (See The Rise of the House ot the Rothschild by Count Egon Caesar Corti, Viena, 1927 p. 27 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/rise_houserothschild.pdf)
** See THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (FOUR) THE ROTHSCHILD, Wednesday, December 1, 2010
*** See THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (THREE) THE ROCKEFELLERS, Tuesday, November 2, 2010
[1] The Currency Act. http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/currencyact.htm
[2] The Revenue Act of 1764, http://www.historycentral.com/revolt/sugart.html
[3] The Bank Of North America. http://chestofbooks.com/finance/banking/Banking-Credits-And-Finance/The-Bank-Of-North-America.html
[4] History of central banking in the United States. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_central_banking_in_the_United_States
[5] The Rise of the House ot the Rothschild by Count Egon Caesar Corti, Viena, 1927 p. 27 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/rise_houserothschild.pdf
[6]America's Forgotten War Against The Central Banks by Mike Hewitt, http://www.financialsensearchive.com/fsu/editorials/dollardaze/2007/1020.html
[7] President Andrew Jackson http://www.scatteredremnant.org/AndrewJackson.pdf
[8] Spencer Perceval http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencer_Perceva
[9] http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/house-of-rothschild-no-one-can-understand-what-has-happened-to-the-planet-without-reading-this/
[10] United States Declares War on Great Britain http://www.historycentral.com/1812/Declares.html
[11] http://www.xat.org/xat/usury.html
[12] Trying to Assassinate President Jackson ttp://www.americanheritage.com/articles/web/20070130-richard-lawrence-andrew-jackson-assassination-warren-r-davis.shtml
[13] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildcat_banking
[14] http://www.dieweltderwahrheit.de/0BB/SOS/TheRothschildHorrorPictureshow/Eng/1-10PagesSOS/SOS4Monopoly.htm
[15] FINAL WARNING: A History of the New World Order http://prernalal.com/banned%20books/NWO.-.Final.Warning.-.History.of.the.New.World.Order.pdf p 69
[16] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banking_in_the_United_States
[17] http://www.xat.org/xat/moneyhistory.html
[18] Bruner, Robert F.; Carr, Sean D. (2007), The Panic of 1907: Lessons Learned from the Market's Perfect Storm, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 9780470152638 citado en http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1907#CITEREFBrunerCarr2007

THE CUBAN CONSPIRACY (FOUR) THE ROTHSCHILD

The long and deep friendship between David Rockefeller -and several members of his family- with Fidel Castro would not be so important if David wasn’t one of the most influential and powerful men in the world.

David Rockefeller's power comes not only from his influence over the world's leading organizations such as the CFR, the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, the U.S. Federal Reserve, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, The Council of the Americas and nearly forty other organizations of planetary hierarchy.

The real power of David lies in his capacity as head of the Rockefeller family, obtained after the death of his older brothers, who in turn inherited it from his father, John D. Rockefeller Junior.

However, despite the huge fortune that Junior inherited from John D. Rockefeller Sr., as we saw in the previous article, he couldn’t have access to the economic and political world power until he established a covenant with the house of Rothschild.

In the last hundred years, there have been many speculations about a conspiracy to gain world power by the international banking in general, the Jewish banking in particular and specifically the House of Rothschild. Most of these “theories” is quite unbelievable if not a complete nonsense.

However, there are many documented facts -which have been systematically hidden- that show the hand and the money from the Rothschilds behind a significant part of the historical events that have shaped the international relations in the last two hundred years.

In fact, banking, Jewish in particular, acquired his predominance in Europe at the beginning of the last millennium because of the need of the royal houses to implement their power at the expense of the anarchic nobility.

Thanks to their partnership with the banking, the European ruling houses were able to create professional armies (mercenary armies) and the bureaucracies required for the formation of their nations and stabilize territories formerly at the mercy of the barons’ will.

The European ruling houses in collusion with the Vatican, got rid of the most chaotic and rebellious nobles, sending them to the chimera of the Crusades.

When the survivors returned from their forays to the Holy Land, they found that their old world had disappeared under the rule of the monarchist families, the church, banking and trade. And those who acquired some power through their military adventures, as the order of the Templars, were simply wiped off the face of the earth. End of story and the middle Ages.

The Rothschilds arrived to this story long after the alliance between the ruling houses of Europe and banking. They were one among many Jewish families that, in the middle of the eighteenth century, suffered segregation at the Frankfurt am Main ghetto. They made the numismatic their way of life.

But, everything changed when William I, Elector of Hesse became client of Meyer Amschel Rothschild. [1]

William I immediately realized the entrepreneurial talent of Meyer Amschel and put him in charge of collecting taxes and other businesses.

Meyer Amschel built the foundations of his fortune in a very simple way. He diverted to his pockets a good slice of the Hessian mercenaries’ wages which William had rented to the British for their war against the American colonial militias. [1]

It is possible that this action of Meyer Amschel helped the victory of Washington's crossing of the Delware River, in his encounter with German troops who probably were very upset.

To make matters worse, the chief of the Hessians, perhaps protesting the trampling of their fees, spent a precious time dressing up and getting powdered up before he lazily took charge of his troops, when the battle was almost decided in favor of the Colonials. In this way, Washington could probably get his first victory after a long career of a general in disgrace. [2]

Amschel Meyer quickly realized that lending money to governments was much more profitable than lending it to private citizens or businesses. And, he devoted his entire career to this matter.

"Give me control a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws," said concisely the founder of the House of Rothschild.

To achieve its objectives, Mayer Amschel raised his five children carefully and sent them from his native Frankfurt to the cardinal economic centers of Europe.

The aim of Mayer Amschel was that each one of them establishes a new branch of the House of Rothschild and that the power remains within it, promoting exclusively endogamous marriages.

Several branches of the Rothschild failed amid the political and economic storms of the nineteenth-century Europe. However, three of the houses, the British, the Austrian and the French ones, achieved their goals by far and came to control the economy not only of these countries but of Europe and the world.

The story of how the Rothschild dominated the British banking is quite representative.

At dusk on the day of the battle of Waterloo, when Napoleon’s fate was sealed, a Nathan Rothschild’s agent, paying excessive amounts for land and sea passages, took the information to his master, hours before that it was officially known in London. [3]

Sole owner of the news of Wellington’s victory, Nathan rushed to sell his bonds of the British Crown in order to make believe the opposite to the British brokers. This move created panic in the stock exchange in London and all the brokers sold their bonds at bargain prices.

Behind the scenes, Nathan bought up all His Majesty’s bonds available in the market. When the truth about the defeat of Napoleon was finally known, the British government bonds acquired huge values. So, Nathan Rothschild was able to multiply hundreds of times his colossal fortune and gained control of the British economy and the finances of His Majesty government.

For its part, the French house of Rothschild, headed by Jacob Mayer, not only had financed Napoleon Bonaparte, who gave them the monopoly on the sale of the government bonds; they also backed the house of Orleans, supporting the promotion of Luis Felipe after the defeat of the Corsican, and the ruling houses of Belgium and Austria. [4]

The French Rothschild branch also controlled the rail and maritime transport between England and France, the French wine industry and the oil industry in Baku. To transport this, they created a fleet of tankers that supplied the Royal Dutch Shell Oil of His Majesty. [5]

Such has been the influence of the three branches of the Rothschild family over the European ruling houses that they all enjoy high nobility titles.

Since the surge of their house, the Rothschilds have followed the strategy of financing and controlling the various factions in all major conflicts.

At the outbreak of American Civil War, the interests of the Rothschild were both in the north and south. [6]

During the Franco-Prussian war the Rothschilds not only had financed both Napoleon III and the Kaiser as well but they made the biggest transaction in history to fund the compensation sought by the victorious Germany to France. [7]

One of the Rothschilds was "accidentally" eye witness of the battleship Maine explosion in the Havana port in 1898. Moreover, when he testified before a U.S. court, he was the one who created the theory that the blast was intentional. [8]

The Maine explosion resulted in Cuban Spanish American War and it inaugurated the U.S. world power. Needless is to say that the Rothschilds had large interests in the finances of both sides of the conflict, the Spanish Crown and the U.S. government, as well.

Decade and a half later, while soldiers massacred each other in the trenches of the First World War, the Rothschilds supported both the German Kaiser as their enemies, the Allied armies.

The Russian civil war kept the Rothschilds busy in the finances of both, the Bolshevik and the "White" armies as well.

In fact, Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, alias Lenin, and the top leaders of the Russian Politburo were agents of the Rothschilds, who defrayed their passage from Switzerland to St. Petersburg in the famous sealed train, with the assault on the Winter Palace as bonus. [9]

The Rothschilds’ assets were behind the creation of the Bank For International Settlements (BIS) in Switzerland, who helped finance industrialization, especially the military industrial complex of Nazi Germany and kept money flowing from Berlin to London and New York, and vice versa before, during and after the Second World War. [10]

The Rothschilds paid for the British and French colonial expansion. They financed the purchase of the Suez Canal by Britain to France; they paid for the oil exploration in Russia and in the Sahara; they financed the monarchies of the czars of Russia, the Habsburgs in most of Western Europe and the House of Windsor in England. They supported the diamond operations by Cecil Rhodes in South Africa and Rhodesia, and saved the Vatican from bankruptcy. Today, the Vatican keeps its huge gold reserves in the Rothschild banks. [11]

In the U.S., through their U.S. and European agents, they supported the Rockefeller's Standard Oil, the Carnegie metallurgical monopoly and the Harriman railroads.

The Rothschilds were, in summary, the real power behind the founding of the state of Israel.

Currently, it is said that the center of the Rothschild world government is in the City of London, an autonomous city in the Vatican fashion in the very middle of the British capital, which is neither subject to the English crown nor parliament.

London City is the headquarters of the Bank of England, the London Stock Exchange and major financial companies in the world. [11]

This has been a very brief account of the influence of the House of Rothschild in world affairs over the past 200 years. These were the powerful allies of John D. Rockefeller Junior, the father of the current head of Rockefeller family. With this force, the Rockefellers set out to dominate the economy and the U.S. government, and therefore the world.

In the vast Rockefellers’ agenda (and, therefore, of the Rothschilds’), Fidel Castro, as we shall see, has an important role.

(To be continued)

NOTAS:

[1] The Rise of the House of Rothschild by COUNT EGON CAESAR CORTI. P 11 http: //www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/rise_houserothschild.pdf
[2] Colonel Johann Gottlieb Rall Guilty of Tactical Negligence or Guiltless Circumstances? by Donald N. Moran http://www.revolutionarywararchives.org/rall.html
[3] The Rise of the House of Rothschild by COUNT EGON CAESAR CORTI. P 159 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/rise_houserothschild.pdf
[4] The Rise of the House of Rothschild by COUNT EGON CAESAR CORTI. P 121, 134, http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/rise_houserothschild.pdf
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_banking_family_of_France
[6] http://www.pakalertpress.com/2010/07/19/house-of-rothschild-no-one-can-understand-what-has-happened-to-the-planet-without-reading-this/
[7] http://www.businessweek.com/1999/99_49/b3658091.htm. Making Money from War--and Peace, Too; summary of the book THE HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD The World's Banker, 1849-1999 By Niall Ferguson
[8] http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F20C1FF63F5D12738DDDA00894DD405B898CF1D3
[9] http://www.pakalertpress.com/2010/07/19/house-of-rothschild-no-one-can-understand-what-has-happened-to-the-planet-without-reading-this/
[10] Hitler's Banker Friends Creators of a Central bank for Central Banks http://www.thechristiansolution.com/doc2009/269_HitlerBank.html
[11] Ring of Power – Empire of the City – 4,000 Years of Suppressed History http://conspiracyrealitytv.com/ring-of-power-empire-of-the-city-4000-years-of-suppressed-history/